Veltos.Tech

Development

AI and ML development

We build AI that solves a defined task and pays for itself, not demos for the sake of demos. Classifiers, recommendations, text and document processing, LLM assistants, and model integration into an existing product.

Pricing
From $2,400
Timeline
A prototype takes 1-2 weeks, a finished integrated solution from 4 weeks. Timelines depend heavily on the state of the data.

A starting price. The total depends on scope, integrations and deadlines.

In short

AI and ML development starts at about $2,400. Typical tasks: classification and labelling, extracting information from text and documents, recommendation logic, LLM chatbots and assistants, forecasting. Work begins with a look at the data: if the data for the task does not exist or is poor quality, no model will rescue it, and we will say so before development starts.

When AI is actually the answer

Machine learning makes sense where there is a repeated decision, a lot of similar data and some tolerance for error. Triaging inbound requests, classifying products and listings, extracting fields from documents, search across an internal knowledge base, personal recommendations: these are the cases where it pays off.

It is not the answer when rules would solve the task, when there is little data, or when the cost of an error is high enough that a human will check every result anyway. In those cases ordinary automation is the honest recommendation: cheaper and more predictable.

LLMs in a product: RAG before fine-tuning

For most text tasks you do not need to fine-tune your own model. Retrieval over your own data combined with a large language model (RAG) produces answers grounded in your documents and updates by adding documents rather than retraining. It is faster, cheaper, and it can cite the source, which matters when the answer rests on a contract or a policy.

Quality control is designed in alongside it: how correctness is measured, what happens with hallucinations, where a human stays in the loop. Without that, an AI feature becomes a source of complaints instead of savings.

Data, privacy and running costs

Before development we settle where data will be processed. If the information is sensitive, we look at models deployed on your own infrastructure instead of external APIs. We also cost the running side early: with solutions built on external models the main expense is not the build but the monthly request volume, and that is better known upfront.

What the work includes

  • Task assessment and an audit of available data
  • A prototype on real data with measurable quality
  • A trained model, or a configured LLM pipeline
  • An API for integration into your existing product
  • An interface or admin panel, where people use the solution directly
  • Quality metrics and a way to keep watching them
  • Deployment and operating documentation

How we work

  1. 01

    Framing and data check

    What exactly is predicted or extracted, what data exists, what accuracy counts as good enough.

  2. 02

    Prototype

    A fast check on real data. If the accuracy is unreachable, this is the cheapest place to find out.

  3. 03

    Building the solution

    Model or pipeline, API, error handling and edge cases.

  4. 04

    Integration

    Wired into the product or process, with an interface and access control.

  5. 05

    Launch and monitoring

    We watch quality on live data and adjust. Models drift over time.

Technology and tools

  • Python
  • PyTorch
  • TensorFlow
  • Keras
  • Hugging Face
  • LangChain
  • NumPy
  • Pandas
  • Jupyter
  • MLflow
  • Apache Kafka
  • PostgreSQL

Selected work

Frequently asked questions

How much does AI implementation cost?

From about $2,400 for a solution built around a specific task: prototype, model or LLM pipeline, API and integration. The cost depends on whether you have labelled data, whether a model needs training or an off-the-shelf one will do, and how deeply the solution embeds into existing systems. Running costs are estimated separately: with external models, monthly request spend can exceed the build cost, so we size it upfront.

We have no data. Can anything be done?

Sometimes. For text and image tasks, off-the-shelf models often work without training on your data, for example extracting fields from documents or classifying inbound requests. For forecasting and recommendations the data is non-negotiable, and collecting and labelling it becomes the first stage. We will tell you plainly if a task is not solvable yet, which is cheaper than a paid experiment with a predictable ending.

Will our data leave for external services?

It depends on the architecture, and that is your decision before work starts. Two routes: external model APIs, cheaper and faster but your data leaves your perimeter; or models deployed on your own infrastructure, more expensive to run but the data stays inside. For sensitive information — personal data, trade secrets, healthcare — the second route is usually the right one, and we design for it from the start.

How is an AI assistant different from a normal chatbot?

A normal bot follows a scripted flow: buttons, branches, fixed answers. It is predictable and it breaks on anything outside the script. An AI assistant answers free-form questions grounded in your documents and knowledge base, including questions nobody anticipated. The trade is quality control: you have to measure correctness and decide where a human stays in the loop.

How do we know AI will pay off?

Count from what the process costs today. If people spend tens of hours a month on repetitive handling — triaging requests, filling in records, digging through documents — the saving is easy to put in money and compare against build and running costs. If no such measurable process exists, start with an audit rather than a model: the task may well be solvable with plain automation and no machine learning at all.

Want to talk it through?

Tell us what needs building. We will work through the task, propose an approach and send a staged estimate. No charge, no commitment.

Related services

Terms used on this page

Further reading